@article{oai:kagawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002013,
 author = {渡辺, 安男 and Watanabe, Yasuo and 渡邊, 友明 and Watanabe, Tomoaki and 岡田, 啓佑 and Okada, Keisuke and 高, 宁 and Gao, Ning and 崎浜, 聡 and Sakihama, Satoshi},
 journal = {香川大学教育学部研究報告 第Ⅰ部, Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Kagawa University. Part I},
 month = {Oct},
 note = {This article considered the necessity of "a qualitative study" as technique of fieldwork. There are a big difference between conventional fieldwork and a recent qualitative study in study intention. It was for conventional study intention to highlight the on-site problem based on the data which we collected in fieldwork. On the other hand, in a qualitative study, it is made an on-site inherent problem study intention to participate in problem solving as a member of the person concerned. In brief, we strengthen fact concerned from an on-site spokesman to the person concerned, and a more practical study is demanded. We take it up about a theory of such a qualitative study by the main subject how old it is.},
 pages = {59--80},
 title = {フィールドワークと質的研究の諸理論—実態調査から課題解決型実践的研究へ—},
 volume = {132},
 year = {2009},
 yomi = {ワタナベ, ヤスオ and ワタナベ, トモアキ and オカダ, ケイスケ and コウ, ネイ and サキハマ, サトシ}
}