ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 香川大学紀要類・刊行物等
  2. 経済学部・経済学研究科・経済研究所(旧:高松高等商業学校・高松経済専門学校)
  3. 香川大學經濟論叢
  4. 第26巻 第1号 (1953年5月)

法の解釈における必然と自由について

https://kagawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5034
https://kagawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5034
02921792-8e48-4128-acbf-ebb08068c461
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
AN00038281_26_1_1.pdf AN00038281_26_1_1.pdf (1.5 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2012-03-27
タイトル
タイトル 法の解釈における必然と自由について
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Theories of freedom and necessity in the interpretation of law
言語 en
見出し
大見出し 論説
言語 ja
見出し
大見出し Articles
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 清水谷, 隆寛

× 清水谷, 隆寛

ja 清水谷, 隆寛

ja-Kana シミズタニ, タカヒロ

en Shimizutani, Takahiro

Search repository
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 There are two different views in the interpretation of law. The one is the view that puts stress on justice or pertinency of law which constitutes one of the ends of law, and that insists on changing its meaning if the law is not apposite from the standpoint of social consciousness of justice. Because this view consents to the changes made in the meaning of law, it is called "free interpretation" or "Freirechtstheorie." The other view puts emphasis on "social order" or "definiteness of law" which is another end of law, and insists that law should not be arbitrarily changed in its meaning even if it is not appropriate from the standpoint of social consciousness of justice. That is to say it repudiates to change the meaning of law but law should be interpreted in the exact meaning it had when it was codified. So this view is called "theory of necessity" or "Begriffsjurisprudenz." Whether the interpretation of law should be free or of necessity, is a difficult question to decide on. However, if both justice and order are the ends of law and if appositeness and definiteness are the attributes law must be provided with, both to insist on perfect freedom and to utterly deny freedom in the interpretation of law, are equally erroneous. The interpretation of law must always be free in order to safeguard justice. Of course there must be a limit in freedom in order to prevent law from falling into confusion and indefiniteness. This limit consists either in the meaning of wording and articles or in the harmony of the code itself as a whole. The interpretation of law should be free so far as it does not impair the legitimate meaning of wording and articles, and destroy the harmony of the code itself. Regarding the criterion of interpretation of law, theory of freedom seeks the criterion in the social consciousness of justice existing at the time when the interpretation of law takes place. The theory of necessity, however, seeks the criterion in that existing at the time when law is made. When we ...
言語 en
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 hanges, interpretation of law should accordingly be changed. In this sense alone interpretation of law is free and limitless.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : 香川大学経済論叢
en : Kagawa University economic review

巻 26, 号 1, p. 1-25, 発行日 1953-05-01
出版者
出版者 香川大学経済研究所
言語 ja
出版者
出版者 Institute of Economic Research, Kagawa University
言語 en
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0389-3030
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00038281
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 321
WAID
1684
KEID
4215
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 13:13:23.487211
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3